https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2800 Programa de Mestrado Profissional em Administração Pública Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:36:57 GMT 2026-10-16T05:36:57Z http://repositorio.ufra.edu.br:443/jspui/retrieve/5718920b-2d38-485f-88e7-1637848fb0c9/PROFIAP.png https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2800 https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2943 Título: Fatores motivacionais associados à intenção de movimentação de pessoal na Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia Autor(es): ALMEIDA, Aylana Cristina Lima de Abstract: The objective of this study was to analyze the motivational factors that influence the intention to change positions among faculty and administrative staff (TAEs) at the Federal Rural University of the Amazon (UFRA), considering both the intention to transfer to another position and the intention to leave the institution. The study falls within the research area of Public Administration and Organizations, contributing to the debate on staff retention and mobility in the context of multicampus federal public universities. The theoretical framework of the study integrated the premises of the main classical and contemporary theories of motivation within the field of Public Administration. This is an applied, descriptive study with a quantitative-qualitative approach, utilizing a semi-structured electronic questionnaire administered to a sample of 169 active staff members—including faculty and technical and administrative staff—whose responses were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), multigroup analysis, and content analysis. The results from the overall sample of civil servants demonstrated that the intention to leave temporarily is primarily associated with the physical conditions and physical safety of the work environment, while the intention to leave permanently was not significantly explained by the variables analyzed. The multigroup analysis showed that, among administrative staff, the intention to leave is strongly influenced by limitations in training, development, and education, given the link to career advancement, while among faculty members, structural and academic support constraints are more closely associated with the intention to leave permanently. The qualitative analysis indicated that retention is related to job stability, attachment to work, and interpersonal relationships, whereas departure is linked to weaknesses in infrastructure, management, and institutional working conditions. The originality of this research lies in demonstrating the determinants of internal mobility and departure at a multi-campus university in the Amazon, with a comparison between faculty members and administrative staff. As a practical contribution, the findings offer concrete insights into the formulation of policies regarding human resources management, infrastructure, and professional development, with potential impacts in the organizational, practical, scientific, and public policy spheres. Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2943 2026-10-05T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2930 Título: Eficiência administrativa nos processos institucionais em uma universidade federal na Amazônia: percepção de discentes, técnicos e docentes Autor(es): MONTEIRO, Adara Isis de Brito Abstract: This study aimed to develop quantitative indicators for analyzing and measuring process efficiency at the Federal Rural University of the Amazon, based on the perceptions of faculty members, technical staff, and students. A descriptive and quantitative methodology was employed, using the 2024 institutional evaluation database of the Internal Evaluation Committee, with variables defined by the National Higher Education Evaluation System (SINAES) and regulations issued by federal oversight bodies. With a sample of 3,204 respondents, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted, enabling the construction of process efficiency indices by segment (students, technical staff, and faculty), with standardized scores ranging from 0 to 1,000 and classified into three evaluative levels: high, intermediate, and low. The statistical quality of the model was confirmed by high Cronbach’s alpha values (0.944, 0.950, and 0.974), Kaiser Meyer Olkin (KMO) measures (0.927, 0.937, and 0.954), significant Bartlett’s tests of sphericity (p = 0.000), and total explained variance exceeding 70% across all groups, ensuring the validity of the constructs and the identification of convergence and divergence points among the categories. The results revealed strong internal correlations among variables, forming factors that synthesize institutional efficiency and allow comparisons between groups. The indices indicated an intermediate evaluation for faculty and students and a low evaluation for technical staff, highlighting perceived bottlenecks in process management.The findings underscore the need for capacity-building initiatives and the systematic use of these indices in management practices, with data monitoring supported by Business Intelligence (BI) tools as instruments of governance and administrative efficiency improvement at UFRA. Based on this research and its conclusions, a technical-technological product was developed in the form of an interactive dashboard created using Microsoft Power BI for the continuous monitoring of efficiency indicators derived from the perceptions of technical-administrative staff, faculty, and students. The dashboard organizes and integrates indicators obtained through statistical analysis of survey responses, enabling dynamic visualization with graphical features that facilitate the identification of strengths and weaknesses in administrative and academic processes. As a governance and control support tool, the dashboard aims to enhance transparency in evaluation results and to support managers and planning teams in the formulation, monitoring, and revision of actions focused on improving administrative efficiency and process management. Furthermore, the dashboard allows for periodic updates and potential replication in other higher education institutions, contributing to the strengthening of data-driven management practices in the public sector.; This study aimed to develop quantitative indicators for analyzing and measuring process efficiency at the Federal Rural University of the Amazon, based on the perceptions of faculty members, technical staff, and students. A descriptive and quantitative methodology was employed, using the 2024 institutional evaluation database of the Internal Evaluation Committee, with variables defined by the National Higher Education Evaluation System (SINAES) and regulations issued by federal oversight bodies. With a sample of 3,204 respondents, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted, enabling the construction of process efficiency indices by segment (students, technical staff, and faculty), with standardized scores ranging from 0 to 1,000 and classified into three evaluative levels: high, intermediate, and low. The statistical quality of the model was confirmed by high Cronbach’s alpha values (0.944, 0.950, and 0.974), Kaiser Meyer Olkin (KMO) measures (0.927, 0.937, and 0.954), significant Bartlett’s tests of sphericity (p = 0.000), and total explained variance exceeding 70% across all groups, ensuring the validity of the constructs and the identification of convergence and divergence points among the categories. The results revealed strong internal correlations among variables, forming factors that synthesize institutional efficiency and allow comparisons between groups. The indices indicated an intermediate evaluation for faculty and students and a low evaluation for technical staff, highlighting perceived bottlenecks in process management.The findings underscore the need for capacity-building initiatives and the systematic use of these indices in management practices, with data monitoring supported by Business Intelligence (BI) tools as instruments of governance and administrative efficiency improvement at UFRA. Based on this research and its conclusions, a technical-technological product was developed in the form of an interactive dashboard created using Microsoft Power BI for the continuous monitoring of efficiency indicators derived from the perceptions of technical-administrative staff, faculty, and students. The dashboard organizes and integrates indicators obtained through statistical analysis of survey responses, enabling dynamic visualization with graphical features that facilitate the identification of strengths and weaknesses in administrative and academic processes. As a governance and control support tool, the dashboard aims to enhance transparency in evaluation results and to support managers and planning teams in the formulation, monitoring, and revision of actions focused on improving administrative efficiency and process management. Furthermore, the dashboard allows for periodic updates and potential replication in other higher education institutions, contributing to the strengthening of data-driven management practices in the public sector. Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2930 2026-08-19T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2892 Título: Eficiência técnica do ensino médio estadual no brasil e implicações para a gestão pública: evidências por DEA Autor(es): MONTEIRO, Allan Pinheiro Abstract: The assessment of technical efficiency in upper secondary education provision represents a central challenge for educational public management in Brazil, given the regional heterogeneity and fiscal constraints that characterize the sector. The research question guiding this study is: how is technical efficiency configured in state-level upper secondary education across Brazilian states, considering their relative capacity to transform available resources into learning outcomes? The general objective is to evaluate this technical efficiency through the application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), adopting a comparative approach to relative efficiency. The 27 Federation Units were treated as Decision-Making Units, using 2023 data from the School Census, SIOPE, and the Continuous PNAD. Inputs included: teachers, state schools, schools with internet access, schools with libraries, and educational expenditure; outputs included: IDEB and the enrollment rate of the population aged 15 to 17 years. Results reveal that, under the CCR model (constant returns to scale), only 2 states (7.4%) are efficient; under the BCC model (variable returns to scale), 9 states (33.3%) achieve the efficiency frontier, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Santa Catarina, Goiás, the Federal District, Acre, and Roraima. Benchmarking analysis identified Espírito Santo as a recurrent reference for 15 of the 18 inefficient units. For the state of Pará, feasible targets were projected: raising IDEB from 4.3 to 4.5 and the enrollment rate from 88.5% to 92.7%, while maintaining current resources. The study contributes theoretically by validating the hypothesis of decreasing returns to scale in the educational public sector; methodologically, by demonstrating that the integrated application of the CCR and BCC models clearly distinguishes structural and managerial components of inefficiency; and practically, by offering a Technical-Technological Product (Technical Guide) delivered to the State Department of Education of Pará (SEDUC-PA). It is concluded that inefficiency in state-level upper secondary education is not homogeneous, manifesting in a dual form – structural (associated with scale) and managerial (associated with resource use) – which requires differentiated interventions and guides public management toward the improvement of governance and resource allocation. Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2892 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2876 Título: Gestão humanizada: contribuições para os desafios de gestão de pessoas de uma universidade pública da Amazônia, sob a ótica da teoria do cuidado humano. Autor(es): OLIVEIRA, Jefferson Modesto de Abstract: People management in the Brazilian federal public service has been increasingly challenged by the intensification of institutional demands, contemporary organizational transformations, and the impacts of these dynamics on employees’ health and well-being. In this context, this dissertation aims to analyze humanized management as an organizational strategy within a public university in the Amazon region, articulating theoretical foundations, institutional analysis, and employees’ perceptions. The study was developed through three complementary chapters in the format of scientific articles. The first chapter consists of a scientometric analysis of the scientific literature on humanized management, examined through the lens of the human caring theory, with the objective of identifying trends, gaps, and theoretical convergences, highlighting the contribution of human caring theory to humanized management. The second chapter analyzes the phenomenon of mental distress in the public service, focusing on sick leaves due to mental disorders at the Federal Rural University of the Amazon (UFRA), relating them to practices of moral harassment and discussing humanized management as an institutional strategy to address these issues, in light of federal regulations and institutional documents. The third chapter presents the results of the field research, conducted using a mixed-methods approach, with the application of a questionnaire to managers, administrative staff, and faculty members at UFRA, totaling 182 respondents, with an estimated margin of error of approximately 6.6% and a 95% confidence level. Quantitative analysis revealed heterogeneous perceptions regarding humanized management practices, while qualitative analysis, based on thematic analysis, identified core meanings associated with weaknesses in institutional dialogue, participation, and recognition. The results indicate that, although there have been normative advances and initiatives aligned with innovation and the modernization of people management in public administration, challenges remain for the consolidation of effectively humanized practices in everyday organizational life. It is concluded that humanized management has strategic potential for strengthening work relationships, promoting care, and addressing mental distress in the public service. Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufra.edu.br/jspui/handle/riufra/2876 2026-01-27T00:00:00Z